Regarding the Home Rule campaign statements
A Fact Check on Commissioners Home Rule Claims
๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ธ: ๐๐ผ๐๐ด๐น๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐โ ๐๐น๐ฎ๐ถ๐บ๐ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ: As Douglas County heads toward a June special election on whether to adopt a Home Rule Charter, county commissioners have ramped up messaging promising tax relief, better governance, and greater local control. But does the evidence back those claims?
Letโs examine their statements and the reality โ particularly around taxes, special districts, public input, and the long-term impact on residents.
CLAIM 1: โHome Rule will lower taxes.โ Commissioner George Teal:โWe want to preserve and protect what we have in Douglas County.โโHome Rule gives us tools to lower taxes and protect property owners.โ
(Source: Colorado Community Media)
FACT CHECK: MisleadingWhile Home Rule might offer structural flexibility, thereโs no guarantee of lower taxes. Under Colorado law and TABOR (Taxpayer Bill of Rights), counties still face limits on how taxes are raised or lowered. The charter doesnโt override state fiscal constraints. Even though Douglas County cut its mill levy in 2024, rising property values still resulted in higher tax bills for many homeowners (CBS News Colorado). Meanwhile, the county has continued to promote the formation of new special districts โ which do raise taxes.
CLAIM 2: โHome Rule gives us more control over local issues.โ Commissioner Abe Laydon:โWe have a remarkable opportunity to empower our citizens with the ability to shape their own futures.โ
(Source: Castle Pines Connection)
FACT CHECK: Contradicted by Actions
The claim of empowering citizens rings hollow when recent county meetings have denied residents the opportunity to speak or ask critical questions about Home Rule. At Wednesday's town hall, Commissioner Abe Laydon threatened attendees with arrest when tensions rose over the lack of transparency and public input. Residents are calling out the process as โdisingenuous.โ The charter commission itself was appointed with little public notice, and many feel its composition does not reflect the political and ideological diversity of Douglas County (Colorado Community Media).
CLAIM 3: โWeโre protecting taxpayers.โ
Commissioner Kevin Van Winkle:โThis is about giving residents more control and protecting taxpayers.โ
(Source: Hoodline)
FACT CHECK: Undermined by Special District Debt and Fees
Douglas County actively supports special taxing districts such as Zebulon, Pine Canyon, and RWR โ even as these districts drive up property taxes. These entities operate with limited resident control and can issue debt, often with long-term consequences for homeowners.In The Meadows, residents are still paying off a 1989 bond of $70 million that has ballooned to $434 million by 2023 due to refinancing and interest. Final repayment could exceed $1 billion over the next century (CBS News Colorado). Only 1 of 7 boards is resident-controlled; most remain tied to developers.Moreover, auto registration fees that should fund road maintenance are diverted to these same metro districts, not public infrastructure (CBS News Colorado).
CLAIM 4: โThis process is transparent and resident-driven.โ County Website:โDouglas County is committed to open government and public engagement.โ
FACT CHECK: Refuted by Public Outcry
Residents have criticized the speed and secrecy with which the Home Rule initiative was launched. One letter to the Parker Chronicle asked why there was no meeting in each district to explain the charter process or take questions before the commission was formed.The commissionersโ town hall events have done little to dispel these concerns. Attendees have reported a lack of real dialogue, with carefully controlled formats and limited space for opposing views.
Conclusion: A Pattern of Power Consolidation, Not Public Empowerment
The pattern is clear: the commissioners promote Home Rule as a path to local empowerment, but the evidence shows a history of pushing financial burdens onto residents through special districts, while curbing public input and consolidating authority.Far from being a grassroots reform, this effort appears to serve:Developers over residents,Insiders over taxpayers, andPolitical power over democratic transparency. Voter Alert: Know
Before You Vote
Before supporting Home Rule, Douglas County residents should ask:
Why is this process being rushed?
Why are public funds being redirected to special districts?
And most importantly: Why should we trust the same leaders whoโve created these problems to now โfixโ them by giving themselves even more power?
Sources:CBS News Colorado: โMeadows Metro District Debtโ
Colorado Community Media: โDouglas County Home Rule Coverageโ
Rocky Mountain Voice: โHome Rule Proposal Catches Residents Off Guardโ
Douglas County Government: Home Rule Info Page
Stay informed. Stay skeptical. And vote with your eyes open.